SECTION 124: SENIORITY IS NOT ALWAYS THE DETERMINING FACTOR WHEN LAYING OFF EMPLOYEES
Release date: December 10, 2007
SECTION 124: SENIORITY IS NOT ALWAYS THE DETERMINING FACTOR WHEN LAYING OFF EMPLOYEES
A receiving clerk filed a complaint pursuant to L.S.A. section 124, alleging that he was dismissed without just cause, whereas the employer claimed the employee was laid off. Following a sales decrease, the employer was forced to restructure the company, laying off 11 people, including the plaintiff, as well as abolishing a management position. According to the commissioner, the evidence showed that a restructuring of the company took place, and that the criteria used by the employer in its selection of employees—versatility and competence, particularly the ability to drive a forklift and autonomy in performing tasks—were not arbitrary, abusive or discriminatory. The C.R.T. could not impose the use of seniority as a criterion, since it had not been used previously. Therefore, the complaint was rejected.
Oscar Rojas-Zalaya and Dynaplast Extruco Inc. ,
2007 QCCRT 0114 (C.R.T.) March 6, 2007, France Giroux
From bulletin Gestion Plus
To suscribe, click here!
Back to the list
To the exclusive service of employers
To the exclusive service of employers, Le Corre offers training workshops and publications on subjects solely pertaining to labour law. Both these tools help managers and human resources professionals to deal more effectively with the daily legal framework of their businesses.